Prufrock's Wargaming Blog

Prufrock's Wargaming Blog

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Simple Zama

I had the chance to have a couple of friends come over for a game the other night and in line with recent musings about accessible rules I decided to try out a 'derivative ancients' scenario.

Units and combat were based on Commands and Colors: Ancients, but without the heavy/medium/light distinctions.

Four figures per base meant four attack dice, three figures three attack dice and so on.  All movement was by hex, as per CCA, and shooting was as javelin-armed shooting in CCA.  Unit casualties were removed in bases so it would be easy to see how strong/weak the units were.

Most of my CCA boardgame gear is back in New Zealand, so we used normal dice for fighting and although I have some cards here we used die-roll activation rather than activation by card play.

Activation pips were d4+1.  It cost one pip to activate a single unit, two pips to activate a line fighting or all moving at the speed of the slowest unit and three pips to activate a line moving or fighting at their own speeds.  Leaders gave a one pip discount to line moves, but lines could not extend across left/centre/right boundaries and nor could they exceed five units.

The activation rules were simple but they gave plenty of scope for players to do what they wanted to do while also giving them some tough decisions to make.  It also avoided adding the extra layer of complexity that using a card system for activation would have entailed.

The scenario was going to be important. I went for a famous battle that had both sides fairly evenly matched and that did not have much in the way of terrain to worry about.  Given the armies I have painted at the moment, Zama was the obvious choice.

I would umpire to give rules advice and help keep things going if the guys got bogged down with options.

To win the game would require nine victory points, with VPs to be scored by destroying enemy units.

The first picture (below) shows the game after the opening move, in which M (as Rome) advanced his light infantry to pepper the elephants and the left wing to threaten the Carthaginian right.

B (as Carthage) responded by shielding the elephants with his own lights and advancing cavalry on both flanks.

Rome took a points victory in the tentative tussles on her right but Carthage got a clear advantage on the other flank (seen below) by virtue of some bold cavalry attacks.

B opened up a 6-1 advantage in unit kills over the Romans and it seemed that Hannibal might have an easy win.

But things were not quite as one-sided as it would appear from the score alone: the Carthaginians had six units reduced to just one remaining base, so if the Romans could get in close enough they would be able to even things up reasonably quickly.

But this was the time when Rome went through a low-pip period, and her attempts to polish off enemy units with missile fire from the Numidians did not go to plan.  Still, the Roman advance got underway in the centre, which caused B to worry for his elephants again.

As M's missile volleys drew closer, B advanced troops out of the line in an attempt to drive off the offending velites. In the confusion the Romans began to score some successes against those already reduced Carthaginian units, bringing the victory count to a more respectable 6-4, and opening up the possibility of picking off some more (if only the javelin men would shoot straight!).

With the pressure building in the centre B sent forward a unit of elephants to hit the Roman heavy infantry, but he could not quite finish them off.

In the counter-attack the elephants were destroyed and two other units with them.  It was now 7-6 to Rome as her remarkable comeback gained pace.

Carthage committed a second elephant which attacked a unit of hastati and while it died in the attempt it took a Roman commander with it.  Still needing one more kill to win the game, M could not quite manage it this turn as he failed to kill off the auxiliaries.  With the score 8-7 to Rome, B and his Carthaginians took up the pip die once more.

With two unit kills needed to claim the victory for Carthage, B threw in everything he could - elephants, Spanish auxiliaries and Gallic warriors.  If they did not win they would be killed in battle back, giving Rome the victory. It was to be knife-edge stuff...

And knife-edged it proved to be: with his last two throws of the dice B managed to kill off the stragglers and claim the last victory points he needed to leapfrog his great mate M and win 9-8.

It was an exhilarating game that had a bit of everything and I was very pleased with how it all went. I think it vindicated the simple rules approach and the 'give-the-players-the-options' command rules.

Both players had a great time and are very keen to play again at some stage, so a good result all round!


  1. Great! Thanks for sharing your game report. The figures/units look great also good to read/see the Romans take a beating ;o)

    your Activation pips system using 4D seems to work fine and if not better than the C&C command cards system.

    best regards,

  2. Great stuff, Aaron. Zama always seems to come close, no matter which rules are used!

  3. Thanks gents, can't really go too far wrong with C&CA as a base!

  4. Nice game - looks like something I'd like to play!

  5. Great game both in play and look. I like your modifications.

  6. Excellent! Games that go right down to the wire are the best.

  7. Great looking Zama, Aaron! The scenarios and rules for C&C ancients always give an interesting and entertaining game - sounds like a really close finish.

  8. Great looking game Aaron. WTG bringing more into the fold. Couple of questions.

    Are you using any flanking rules or did you just make facing changes for show?

    Using the ordinary there a fundamental change here or do you just roll against a chart and have the same general results?


    1. Cheers, John! No flanking rules; I just kept it as uncomplicated as possible. The guys naturally turned the units towards the closest enemy which is why there are some facing changes shown, but they are purely cosmetic. The dice scores I used were 1 for retreats, 4 for leader hits, 5 for sword hits, 6 for 'color' hits. Hope that clears things up!


  9. Good job Aaron. My children seem to understand rolling multiple dice and checking for hits (at the moment we are playing a very simplifed Heroscape that I picked up form a thrift store). And a 9 year old I played ww2 20mm against liked rolling multiple dice and counting hits. I am thinking that this seems to be the way to go for introduction to the hobby. I think you are onto a winner with these rules.

    And I really like your die rolling and PIP allocation for activation.

  10. A great report for a great battle, beautiful minis!

  11. nicely done! i like how you simplified the cca rules. cheers!


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...