Prufrock's Wargaming Blog

Prufrock's Wargaming Blog
Showing posts with label Gauls. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gauls. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 20, 2017

Last of the Gauls

And so the last of the Gauls are done. I don't know if people have ever experienced an antipathy build up over a period of time towards a particular sculpt in an army you are painting, but, in this army, it did. There were two particular sculpts - and four others not far behind - that I grew to absolutely hate. It made painting this army a pretty bad experience, and is a large part of why these last few units have taken so long to do. By the end I just didn't care very much (and it shows) - it was simply a matter of gritting teeth, slapping paint on and getting them finished.

But they are done, and that's that.

You may notice the singly-based figures at the rear. I was planning to throw the dominant sculpt you see there out, but decided in the end that I would condemn it to eternal markerhood. But that might change if I could ever bring myself to paint another 50 Gauls to replace them all. I would get a lot of pleasure out of stamping on them....


But that's 300 infantry and 50 cavalry in total now, so enough for my Lost Battles needs.






Monday, September 4, 2017

A few more figures finished

And some more painted up from the leftovers box. This time a mix of Tin Soldier and Xyston 15mm Gauls (with one Old Glory figure in there as well, I believe). These are from a long-stalled project. Still five more units to paint, and it's hard work, because, a) I don't like painting Gauls b) my painting style has changed a bit since I did the first eighteen or so units of these and this latest batch is an unhappy compromise between the old and the new and c) I'm becoming less and less of a fan of the Tin Soldier figures.

Oh well, only a few more units to go. I wonder if I can get through them!




I think the thing might be to do a Caesar in Gaul game and see if that can't motivate me for the last stretch.


Sunday, December 8, 2013

Gallic chariot test model

Here's a test model for the Gallic chariots I ordered from Old Glory 15s a while ago.  All chariots are a pain to do for someone of my limited modelling skills and general impatience, but I do love how the blighters look when they are done...

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

Caesar's Battles: Bibracte

"It's the Helvetii, Gaius Julius!"


In 58 BC, while shadowing the Helvetii, a migrating Gallic tribe supposedly menacing Roman allies and territory, Caesar took  a detour towards the town of Bibracte to stock up on food supplies.  Hearing of this from deserters, the Helvetii decided to launch a surprise attack.  In the words of the man himself (from the first book of his Gallic War):

The Helvetii, either because they thought that the Romans, struck with terror, were retreating from them . . . or because they flattered themselves that [the Romans] might be cut off from the provisions, altering their plan and changing their route, began to pursue, and to annoy our men in the rear(1.23)

[Caesar]  drew up on the middle of the hill a triple line of his four veteran legions . . . he placed above him on the very summit the two legions which he had lately levied in Hither Gaul, and all the auxiliaries; and he ordered that the whole mountain should be covered with men, and that meanwhile the baggage should be brought together into one place, and the position be protected by those who were posted in the upper line. The Helvetii having followed with all their wagons, collected their baggage into one place: they themselves, after having repulsed our cavalry and formed a phalanx, advanced up to our front line in very close order. (1.24)

In Lost Battles, the Gauls get the first move.  My plan was to have them advance as quickly as they could in an effort to rush the Roman position on the hills.  It didn't look impossible, but Caesar's trump card was having five late-arriving units off-table (shown here in camp) which he could bring on to reinforce the line where reinforcement was most needed.


Complicating matters for the Gauls is that their infantry line is fighting out of a river (attack penalty for the lead unit), fighting up hill (attack penalty for the lead unit), fighting fresh legionaries (attack penalty for the lead unit) and that the army, with no named generals, is short on intrinsic command points.  In their favour, the Gauls have numbers and the better cavalry.

So much for the preliminaries; let's now go to the battle itself.

It begins as the Gauls advance their infantry line into and across the river.



They attack Caesar's left with the veteran cavalry (it's actually illegal to attack up hill when charging from distance, but I forgot that in the heat of the moment).


In the Roman turn Caesar brings two units of legionaries and the light infantry in on the right of the hill, recalling the levy cavalry into position behind them.


The Roman attacks are effective: the cavalry defend the hill line and the veteran infantry fire off their pila to decent effect (4 hits are scored).

His soldiers hurling their javelins from the higher ground easily broke the enemy's phalanx. (1.25)



On their turn the Gauls are finding it difficult to coordinate their attacks (lack of command points due to a low command die roll), but they attack up the hill (an all-out attack succeeds, which hits both the attacker and the defender) and move the cavalry on the left into line.


They do not have the ability yet to advance on the Roman right.


The Romans attack downhill again, with more success.  They shatter the Gallic cavalry assaulting their left and continue to do damage to the infantry line (3 more hits are scored).

The Gallic left advances against the Romans on the right of the hill.


In the centre the tribesmen start to put some pressure back on the legionaries as the Roman first line tires (3 hits).


The Roman second lines come into action with devastating effect. The Gallic line holds, but only just.  The centre is now completely spent (7 hits).

[The Romans] made a charge on them with drawn swords.  It was a great hindrance to the Gauls in fighting that, when several of their bucklers had been by one stroke of the pila pierced through and pinned fast together, as the point of the iron had bent itself, they could neither pluck it out, nor, with their left hand entangled, fight with sufficient ease; so that many, after having tossed their arm about, chose rather to cast away the buckler from their hand, and to fight with their person unprotected. (1.25)

The Roman cavalry - actually allied Gauls - are now in position behind the Gallic centre-right, which is not good for morale, and obstructs any Gallic withdrawal to the hill in the rear.

The Romans are again beginning to tire, but they have more fresh  reserves to call on than the Gauls do at this point (2 hits from the Gauls).


The Romans shatter an infantry unit now, but the rest of the line stands firm (2 hits).

With time running out, the Gauls make one more supreme effort to break the Roman will.  Concerted attacks knock the breath out the legionaries but their experience keeps them from folding under the pressure (4 hits).

Steady!
At Caesar's command the Romans seize the initiative: a grinding push in the centre shatters two units and panic spreads (a double hit causes two shatters and this is followed by a morale roll of 1).

At length, worn out with wounds, they began to give way. (1.25)


The Gallic left holds on for a little longer, but once the situation elsewhere becomes apparent it also breaks. The cavalry get clean away, but the infantry are not so fortunate.

The battle is over, and Caesar has won an important victory!

________________________________________________

The refight followed the general course of Caesar's description fairly closely, up to where the Helvetii retreat to the hill on their side of the field and up which the Romans pursue them. Of course, due to the Roman cavalry in the Gallic rear the Gauls never got a chance to withdraw in the refight.  If they had been able to do so it might have been a different result.

Points:
The Romans score 82. 5 shattered, 11 routed, 2 withdrawn.
The Gauls score 76. 11 spent; handicap of 35.

The result is still tight, but the Romans have done enough to ensure the victory.

Observations:

The Gauls may do better by retreating back to the hill and drawing the Romans forward into the disadvantageous river sections.  Of course, they can't do that with unprotected flanks, so the cavalry on the right has to be better used or, failing that, more successful with its dice rolling.

It was a good fight, and some subtle tweaks to strategy here and there are crying out to be tested.  I was also quite pleased - after recent painting efforts - to be able to field a Gallic army :)  I'm looking forward to using it again.


Friday, November 29, 2013

Starting to look like an army...

Managed to finish off another 36 Gauls this week, and, annoyingly, lose a shield somewhere while basing them up!

They're starting to look more like an army now, which is good.  Can almost do Bibracte and Sambre with Lost Battles now, but the plans are growing: Sentinum is a must, so the chariots and Samnites are underway...



Not all stands are flocked yet, but you get the idea!  Another 90 or so troops to go...

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

The most enjoyable part of painting...

Tonight I've had the pleasure of doing the most rewarding step of the painting process, so here they are, the time-consuming little beauties!  Only the flocking left to do - oh, and another hundred and twenty or so to paint, of course...

The front:


The back:


And a little gloating:

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Painting more Gauls

Well, here are the results after a week or so of mucking about with the 'wet palette' and a reasonably small batch of figures.

The painting is certainly not earth-shattering, but I probably do pay a little more attention to detail in doing a smaller batch, so it's an approach that's perhaps worth pursuing.




These still have a little bit more to be done on them, but are pretty much done.  Only another 150 Gauls to go...

Onward and upwards!

Friday, November 8, 2013

Wet palette results

Well, after doing a little work on some Gauls last night I have to say I am favourably impressed by the wet palette.  I can switch between colours a lot more easily, and even this morning the paints were still fresh and usable.  As chopping and changing between colours is less of a chore, I think it may allow me to adjust the production line method I currently use to one that can start and finish smaller batches in a shorter space of time.

It remains to be seen whether smaller batches more frequently is better for the motivation than massive batches very occasionally, but we shall see!  It can see that it could be appealing to churn out a unit in a couple of evenings...

The paint kept fresh overnight.

Doing Gauls in smaller batches?  Good Lord!

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Gauls blooded

With the cavalry and the first third of the infantry now done, it was clearly nearing time to get the Gauls to table.  One of the wargamery mid-term plans I have is to finish off an article and Lost Battles scenario I'm putting together for Slingshot, so I decided to give the nascent scenario a test run last night using a quarter-sized game board.



And wouldn't you know it, but the Gauls came out on top.  They didn't win the battle, but they won the game.

Not bad for their first attempt!

Of course, the second test went the way of the Romans, but that is only to be expected...



Sunday, May 19, 2013

Gauls and cricket...

With the test match on at Lord's tonight I've been finishing the prep for the last of my Gallic infantry as I don't want to leave the computer for the painting room.  Shame that New Zealand has thrown away a good chance to build a first innings lead, but credit must go the the English bowlers and to the approach of their batsmen in the second innings.

Anyway, the Gauls must be getting annoyed with me talking about cricket, and I do want them to perform on table for me, so I'd best shut up!



Monday, April 29, 2013

More Gauls

The test lot of Gauls is almost done.  Here are a few shots post Klear coat but pre matt varnish (hence the shinyness).  Photos are a bit ropey, but the figures look quite lively in the lead, as it were.  I think the Tin Soldier / Xyston mix is going to turn out OK, but I'm going to have to clip off the stands on some of the taller TS figures to help them blend in a little better.





Monday, April 22, 2013

Painting Gauls: the colour / pattern guinea pigs.

Have been testing paint and pattern combinations for the 330 or so Gauls I have to paint.  It's very slow going, but some progress has been made.  I've now got about four sets of base and highlight colours that go together reasonably nicely, and another couple that I'll use base and wash with.  Not very happy with the patterns so far, but hopefully I'll get better as we go along!

The idea is to have around half of the figures in drab, plain patterned articles,with every second figure having something mildly fancy (stripes of some description; rich colours; armour, etc), and every sixth or seventh figure in something a bit spiffy (in checked patterns, having a nicely striped cloak, good shield, etc).



It's very slow going, but once I get the groundwork done things should progress faster (he says with fingers crossed...).

To finish on a positive note, I pulled out the few bases of Gauls I painted six years ago and while they are too small to join this crew it's noticeable that my painting skills have improved in the interval, so that's some good news.

Friday, February 3, 2012

(Note the edit!) Comparing Tin Soldier and Xyston Gallic Infantry

In response to some interest shown in the last post on Gauls, here are some photos showing Xyston and Tin Soldier Gauls in close proximity. 

Do note though that I'm using the older packs of Xyston Gauls (18250 and 18251, now recombined into 20036).  I don't know what the ones from the newer packs are like.  If you want the Xyston packs I have, go to Brookhurst Hobbies which has them on special at the moment.

Tin Soldier chaps are on the ends with square bases; Xyston in the centre with oval bases. 


You'll notice that there's actually quite a bit of variety in height between the tallest and the shortest of the Xyston.  The taller ones are an almost perfect match for the Tin Soldier fellows; the shorter Xyston are a little smaller.


In this picture below you can see the difference between a TS standard and Xyston's shortest. (2nd and 3rd figures from the right, respectively).


And again, without the foreshortening.


Some shots from the rear...




Swords are of the same length, and shields match very well.  In the picture below the top row of shields is all Xyston, the bottom TS.


For my money the two ranges go together very well.  I've gone for a ratio of about 5 packs of TS for every 2 of Xyston, and am pretty sure I'll be very happy with the finished army.  If you want a price comparison, TS are GBP 2 a pack, Xyston are GBP 3.50.

Be warned that for cavalry all bets are off - you can't mix 'em, it's as simple as that.  Tin Soldier are close to 20mm (In fact I would have no problems using them with other 20mm) and the Xyston seem a little smaller than their own infantry.

Here's a link to the TS page showing the various figures they have in their Gallic range.

Any questions or any other shots you'd like to see, fire away!

EDIT - a chap on TMP vigorously disagrees with my assessment, so I took another look.

Here are shots of more of the TS figures mixed in with Xyston (TS have the square bases):




He is partly right - the armoured TS Gauls are definitely bigger than the other sets in their range and do not mix well with the Xyston.  Those are packs C3 & C4.  I still maintain the other packs are a good mix; though the wide-faced fellows of C10 and C11 may not be everyone's cup of tea.

So, I recommend packs C5, C9, C12 unhesitatingly.  Packs C8, C10 and C11 suit me but may not suit others.  Packs C3 and C4 are probably too big.  The naked Gaesati types I don't know, as I didn't pick any up.

Thanks to General Montcalm for his thoughts!

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Boxes of Goodness, 1

My pre-Christmas orders are being separated into their various lots.  This is my Gallic army, made up of the very nice Tin Soldier and Xyston infantry (which match each other superbly) and Xyston cavalry.  I'm not quite so impressed with the cavalry - it's going to be a mission getting them to fit properly on their horses, by the looks of it - but it should be a fine army when it's finished.

I really like the figures in the Tin Soldier Gallic range (and their service was excellent).  Unfortunately, while lovely figures, the cavalry was closer to 20mm in size, hence the decision to use Xyston for the mounted.


I'm quite excited about getting a paintbrush to these fellows as I've been needing Gauls for a long time.  I will be using the beautiful painting of Scott MacPhee as my model, but I fear I shall fall some way short of his high standards!

There's also the small matter of finding the time to do them!  Never mind; rainy days and all that...

Before I finish, I'd like to again mention the wonderful customer service of Judy at Tin Soldier and Larry at Brookhurst Hobbies.  They have been very helpful to me at all times, despite the inconvenience I no doubt cause them.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...